Simultaneous turns in multiplayer

16 May, '22
Matt

I was going to add this if it wasn't here yet, this is by far my most desired feature with the game. Personally I would prefer asynchronous multiplayer over simultaneous turns, which is probably easier to implement too. Everything else is great!

1

16 May, '22
Diahborne

Could you add more details to what this feature is and why the devs should add it please?

16 May, '22
Lars

I think, simultaneous turn-play is mandatory for online Multiplayer! PLS implement :)

16 May, '22
ako

this and an option to watch other players battles (for chill games with friends.)
also because moving while someone is fighting might be unfair.
let it be al options for the player to tailor the game he likes.

16 May, '22
Martijn Maas

Simultanious turns would be great.

16 May, '22
butttface

I was also gonna add something like this. For multiplay it feels slow burn or long when we wait for each others turn so these mode could be added as a mode or option for players or make each turn have less waiting for other player or be able to do things on the map while its not on your turn

16 May, '22
Iván

I don't like the idea, would be unfair or turn the Game To an RTS when si a table rpg Game, maybe they could make something like timers (outside battles)

1

16 May, '22
KC

In tb games like Humankind, it's simu turns, and, fighting a battle does not freeze everyone else's game.

16 May, '22
Red Dragon

I think SimTurns would be by far the best investment of dev time above all else - even just from a sheer self-interest business perspective: To create a title that has really lasting staying power in the genre and continues to sell well far into the future it NEEDS to support a large and healthy multiplayer scene - and that is just not gonna happen without SimTurns if people will have to suffer such long waiting times. A healthy MP scene also has other benefits beyond driving sales: Properly balancing the game is all about the accumulated mp experience of the committed "superfans" who know the game inside and out and really push the meta to its breaking point (so that devs can make nerfs and buffs accordingly). Community content like new maps and mods also thrive on continued and lively interest in the multiplayer scene.

1v1 fights on small and medium maps are already barely tolerable and 3+ players is borderline unplayable for people who aim to have a life on the side.

1

16 May, '22
Yme

It would be good to know what the opportunity cost is for developing simultaneous turns. This feature will only benefit a portion of the playerbase (inpatient multiplayer gamers) and will have zero benefit for single player gameplay. If the choice is two new factions or simultaneous turns, then I would much prefer the former.

1

16 May, '22
Scream Admin

@yme my personal opinion as somebody that loves multiplayer, is that some sort of simultaneous turns options should be implemented. Singleplayer is fun, but people leave after they play singleplayer. The replay value is in multiplayer, and is ultimately what will keep a game like this alive.

It's not about patience, or lack thereof. For example there's a four player map called Four Corners. It takes 5+ hours to play, even with quick players. Eventually people are taking 5 minute turns. Waiting 15 (sometimes more) minute before you can do anything, is tough.

17 May, '22
Kvorum

I expressed my opinion on this matter on the first game day. But once again I repeat, there must be simultaneous moves! The game has great potential, and the competitive component is of great importance in its future destiny. Waiting, hoping :)

17 May, '22
Heroes Fan

The multiplayer part of the game should definitely be reworked simultaneously because we get bored of waiting for minutes while playing, especially when we are 4 people.

17 May, '22
Deconnetable

Simultaneous turns is impossible guys, the primary essence and every strategic component of this game is based on a turn by turn structure.

1

17 May, '22
Sir.Beast/Seto

maybe more ways to customize matches and a way to save that feature so when you rehost you can reload the settings, as if we had more options we could probs balance ourselfs tho i feel maybe more movement might speed up matches, so maybe a slider that will allow you to add on movement to the weilders to ajust the match time with everyones amount of time they can play, i feel that might be more the way to go as everyone has certin amount of time they can play and can ajust due to what players say how much time they have as most matches don't get contenued they'all rather start a new match, also some more game modes would be nice like king of the hill, making it so it will take you 10 turns ajustable to take mid and win the match, also maybe pass through some maps into the community domain from the custome maps so we know devs had a good lookthrough and fixup before releasing a new map in community, maybe some map competitions every month or few months would be nice for the community

17 May, '22
Game kNight Plays

ST done right would work
ST done wrong will be a trainwreck - luckily, this is early access and I think this should be a priority. As @Scream stated, singleplayer only last so long - I've played four corners against 3 AI and even with them not taking too long, I ended up spending 4+ hours in that map before I won.

That said, it will need to be a choice between ST and something to do while waiting your turn as I suggested.

ST, right now, seems like the more popular choice.

17 May, '22
MrGoldmember

we need a way to program how many turns will be simonaneous

17 May, '22
Mondeschain

To everyone that is worried about simultaneous turns being something unachievable, what most people are expecting is just the mechanics that we had in Heroes Of Might And Magic 3 with the "simultaneous turns" mod. It didn't convert the game in any way to an RTS, it was just an implementation to play the turns simultaneously (within the same game round) in case none of the players interacted in any way between them. When two players encountered in the same map portion or interacted with the same object/mobs, the simultaneous turns were automatically disabled for the rest of the game. To be honest it was a great implementation, it kept multiplayer games definetly quicker for the first part of the game session and it didn't change the mechanics or the spirit of the game in any way.

1

17 May, '22
Spawni

Yes, that's I wanted to talk Mondeschain, the feature from HOMM, didn't know there was a mod for HOMM3, but the first time I used it was on HOMM5 and it was awesome. As you say the feature was disable once you can interact with others, but there was map design for this feature to not interact with them before the end game.

17 May, '22
Gildagriffon

I dont understand reason for disabling simultaneous turns afret players interact with each other, lets say say 2 players fight eatch other so what? Turn not going to end untill all players press end turn button anyway..

17 May, '22
Smok

@Gildagriffon "faster clicking player gets advantage" is the reason some people don't want ST when interacting with other players. If ST designer happens to be that person, then you get breaking ST like in HoMM3. If ST designer is not that person, then you get not breaking ST like in Age of Wonders 3.

17 May, '22
Neodamus

My friends and I have been talking about this game for a long time, all HOMM / AOW / Civ players. None of us bought SoC on release because it doesn't have simultaneous turns.

With all due respect, I definitely understand the struggles of deving on an indie budget and also know that is an Early Access release, but it's unfathomable to me for a turn-based multiplayer game to not have simultaneous turns as a given in this day and age.

To me, not implementing this standard feature is a clear signal that multiplayer has been an afterthought up to this point. Adding it in now would definitely show that multiplayer is, in fact, an important aspect to the dev team and make the game purchaseable at this stage. I believe the fact that this is the top suggestion out of the gate vindicates this point.

17 May, '22
Andriod

Together with a friend I played ~30 games of HoMM3 HD with simultaneous turns, some lessons learned:

Prio
- Its clear you shouldn't need to wait for each other the first rounds, before you even meet.
- Its clear you shouldn't need to wait for each other if everyone is on the same team
- I would prioritize allowing the players themselves turn it on and off, as one please, as games may move in aggressive and defensive waves. And as it is hard to make a correct algorithm for it from the get to. This could work like; anyone can turn if off, but all have to agree to turn it on. We have dreadfull memories of having to reload games in HoMM3 after the auto-turn-off-simo-turns kicked inn, as one could not do it mid-game.
- Turning it off, as the game design is now, have to revert the whole round for all players. Can be be abused? Yes, but thats for social control to deal with in the first iteration of such a feature.

Later
- Turn timers
- Tweak it so it cant easily be abused.
- Give warnings

17 May, '22
Derrick Peterson

Love this idea, as long as it is an option and not mandatory and the option for alternating turns can still be had.

1

17 May, '22
Yme

@Scream so if I understand it right, initially the game is fast for all 4 players because the number of decisions in early game is low. As the game progresses and the choices increase, the duration of each players' turn also increases. Given that once you have visibility of other players' heroes / assets, the ST goes out of the window, the benefit is really just during the early game when turns are fast anyway. There also doesn't seem to be a consensus among those who commented on how ST should look exactly.

As I say, I'm not opposed to it in principle, but there is an opportunity cost to everything - so how much other content are people prepared to forgo to have slightly quicker games in multiplayer?

17 May, '22
CheehC

DO NOT DO THIS!

The only way you can make it simultaneous is that during the other person's turn you can schedule the purchase of units/town advancements so that it speeds up your turn. Otherwise, if you move wielders at the same time as your opponent it creates completely different gameplay which in my opinion would suck.

1) People would wait for a turn timer to almost finish before completing all movements by their wielder's as to avoid surprises.
2) If at the start of a turn two opposing wielders were say 5 spaces away from each other but close to a settlement, then it would become a quick race at the start of the turn to click the button to get to the unfortified settlement before the other.
3) The whole game is based on turn-based strategy. Its played like chess and not supposed to invoke adrenaline. Trying to play this game on fast forward, panic, quick decisions, would make me want to quit so fast. Its a beautiful game, great music and and an ode to HOMM type games.

1

18 May, '22
Gildagriffon

If we allow simultaneous turn only for few early game turns we will not change anything Basically, game still will be 12+ hours long, few turns in beginning will not solve problem

But, maybe you guys forgetting that simultaneous turn is only for one turn..you or your human opponents not going to move for next round untill everyone presses "end turn" button.

18 May, '22
Alek

only now did I find this voting list. Simultaneous turns are the most important thing that the game lacks in its current state.
The ability to turn it on and off.
From poverty it can be even like in homm3 where time is set with simultaneous turns and then the game is standard.
Please introduce this feature as soon as you can

18 May, '22
Papa Pasda'

Something that must be considered if they do simultaneous turns is this :

https://songsofconquest.featureupvote.com/suggestions/300297/ability-to-queue-up-wielder-movement-across-turns

This would allow your wielders to go straight at their desired location at the beginning of the turn so you flee an enemy wielder by example.
Please upvote ! ;)

18 May, '22
Game kNight Plays

Consider voting this up too https://songsofconquest.featureupvote.com/suggestions/300135/add-waiting-for-turn-actions
My suggestion would not be instead of ST but on top of - if the ST stops when a set time has passed, people will still have something to do while waiting their turn.
It would also make it possible, when yout ST is over and you wait for the others to finish, to still be able to plan/read/view your wielders and towns.

All in all, making the games faster and more enjoyable.

18 May, '22
TheSpongePower

By far the most needed thing to add to the game !

18 May, '22
Melonater

I worry that simultaneous turns could ruin what I enjoy about the game which is that its specifically turn based and not an RTS. I dont have the best reactions so RTS and games that rely on clicking on the map the fastest just make me frustrated. That said some sort of QOL which make turns quicker or something to do while its someone elses turn would be nice as at this point you spend most of your time not playing in 4 player games.

1

18 May, '22
Mastese

I don't get why this is being pushed for. Did anyone buy this thinking it was a RTS? Pouring time into development of this is a waste of time and resources better spent elsewhere.

1

18 May, '22
Eccy

I am very glad that this feature is included to be in the game in the future as it saves a lot of time be cutting the boring wait.

And I hope that simultanious will be also in SP :)

18 May, '22
Coldsteel

I don't like this option as it would require a big rework of the game engine. I'd much rather they put their efforts into a good random map generator and beefing up the map editor and documentation. Very few people play this type of 4x game in MP. Most play it SP and that's where the most effort should go.

1

18 May, '22
Stebs

I dont even care about simultaneous turns. All I want to do is be able to plan my next move during my friends turns. Everything going black and white without me even being able to look at my own city, troops, or click on objects and objectives to remind myself what they offer feels so limiting and makes my next turn take that much longer. Games could have a nicer flow with this implemented and I wouldn't be browsing the internet during other peoples turns.

Seriously. Do this and im a life long fan. It's a great game and the user generated content will only continue to make it better and better.

1

18 May, '22
Kvorum

@Stebs
I am very glad that you touched on this important topic, I even wanted to create a separate topic on this issue. Completely agree with you! Please give us more freedom while waiting for other players!

1

18 May, '22
Yme

@Stebs I like this. Being able to "queue" your actions while waiting for the opponent and then when it's your turn have a pop up to confirm all queued actions (with ability to specify the order in which they should be executed - e.g. recruit creatures, move to pick up resource, etc.) would make all turns quicker, not just in early game.

1

18 May, '22
NoodleeHUN

So far i can't understand people who says the game is slow... played 2 large maps 3 and 4 normal AI since i couldn't find hard... the 1st was quite fast, the second one was even faster (67 turns), tho the AI takes hell lot of time... i usually finish my turns in 2-4 min.. even with combat... the fights later on gets even shorter, since the game is quite imbalanced yet... whoever takes 15 min each turn should be thrown out of your MP session and play sims alone IMHO.

Simultaneous turns are totally pointless in a games like this... if everyone cries about it, well yeah, make it, but still, only until 2 parties has seen each other and after that comes the good old waiting game.

19 May, '22
Spq2me

Everyone who sad no - business opponent

19 May, '22
Maraddor

Maybe add options to choose between classic and simultaneous rounds? Such an option existed in Age of Wonders Shadow Magic, for example, where you could choose the type of rounds depending on your preference (of course, there was no such option in Hot Seat). Being able to observe the environment, checking research requirements, buildings, our hero and unit status during the opponent's turn in multiplayer (as has already been suggested in this topic) would also be a sure substitute for a simultaneous turn, as it would allow us to plan our moves in advance.

19 May, '22
Glyfos

I can't really see a reason why some people are like : "DO NOT DO THIS!'!
Even if it's added to the game, I assume it will always stay as an option.

Simultaneous turns as in heroes 3 or 5, which ends when 2 players meet would always be cool and something that has nothing to be afraid of.

I personnaly would like a fully simultaneous turns, which do never disable itself, in order to play with friends (we can agree on who moves when etc...)
But this is definitely more tricky and would cause some client/server issues, so I would understand if it's not implemented.

But if it's not costy for the production (if partial simultaneous turns are already added), feel free to implement it as another option, still cool.

19 May, '22
le_lobuz

I guess it could work by making the underlying code a bit more RTSy (as in multiple weilders can move at the same time, until a given player ends his turn), and then slapping turn-basedness onto it. Then it would come to balancing act - you could either have a moderator that turns off sim turns at a certain point in a game or do it automatically. Or make groups of players who have sim turns. (like allies could have sim turns).

Not a bad idea, but I guess the balancing act is more problematic.

19 May, '22
Wasaby

I don't understand why people are so reluctant to this feature. It already exist in HoMM 5/7 and age of wonders and it worked very well at the time. For people who disagree, at least give real arguments (only few people have legitimate concerns about this...)

19 May, '22
Capprice

Too much hype on this imo
-- As soon as two heroes from enemy teams are in movement range of each other it goes to turn-based mode. It will never go back to simultaneous mode

It took a while for Homm3 to have this feature and the game was fine without it and still it was a better game than Homm5+. Definitely not highest prio.
If you are just waiting for this feature to BUY the game, you should should leave.

I am in favor of this don't misunderstand. Just I'd rather developers focus on other aspects first

19 May, '22
player

Started a game with 5 AI, to watch how the AI acted.
They barely left their base, turns began to crawl, and eventually waiting for turns to end became unbearably slow,

19 May, '22
Red Dragon

I don't know if this has ever been solved before and there are perhaps good reasons why it can't work but how about this: Keep simturns on all the time (but still everyone is on the same turn ofc) and only "freeze" two wielders when they come into some kind of aggro range (Say a range of 8 squares in every direction. If two hostile's range overlap only those two wielders get "frozen" (everything else is still simturns) and the game randomly chooses who gets to go first (Say the wielders get a red exclamation point and a number over their head). The first player gets to go first an can choose to engage or run away. The beauty of this would be that even if more and more wielders manage to get into aggro range on this same turn to pile into the fight they just get assigned higher and higher "turn" numbers and the fights/escapes get resolved in order. Players not engaged in that fight can meanwhile use their turn with other wielders to fight mobs or whatever.

20 May, '22
Glyfos

Red Dragon I like the idea and I also got something like this in mind, but I think it would be a hell to code and set up (a to prevent specific conflicting cases)

22 May, '22
Jonathan

The way I imagine simultanous turns is that each wielder has a "zone of control", if another wielder steps into this zone of control, the game reverts to a normal turn based for the players that are involved. Once the other wielder either has won a battle over the other wielder or stepped out of the zone of control simultanous turns continue again.

24 May, '22
especial1986

Simultaneous turns would be the way to go, one of the reasons why me and my mates played HoMM with the patch/mod with Simultaneous turns. Make it possible to enable/disable and also customisable to be turned off when wielders get within walking distance of one another or to just let it run.

In sum:
Allow for sim turns to be enabled or disabled
If enabled, also allow an option to keep it forever or to be disabled after wielders get close

25 May, '22
Kanjejou

Allow the choice for simultaneous turn and make it a choice if i want to play competitiv or simultaneous turn just chill game with friends

26 May, '22
LionSky

I love you guys! Thank you for this amazing game! Hell, it was about time for this beauty :)))

The only thing missing is Simultaneous turns and coop multiplayer stable along with fair mirror maps of all sizes for players to play. Also besides 1v1, 2v2 and maybe 3v3 would be much appreciated for mirror maps! Hope you can add this whenever you find time! Thanks again and back to the Campaign now (hope you add much more Campaign stuff in the final release, and the already famous day-night cycle form the earlier trailers *wink wink*). Much love and appreciation for you guys! <3

27 May, '22
whackamole

I truly enjoy this game, and even more playing with friends, but the waiting every time makes the game veerrrrrrrrry slow in multiplayer to the point where i start doing other things such as playing on my phone and I start to lose interest. Simultaneous turns for multiplayer would be a game changer for me.

27 May, '22
DD

I tried playing with my friends vs AI and the waiting was not pleasant... can't even watch their battles for entertainment. I hope this get implemented as an option.
In case it becomes a problem to implement, try to make it simultaneous turns for teams (T1 goes first then T2 and so on) to make it somewhat faster + the choice of starting team when setting up the map.

27 May, '22
Wigglymirrors

Not sure if it's been stated above but the way this could be implemented is by allowing everyone to do their turn at the same time and once they've concluded their round, they end their turn the same as usual. Then if anyone else is still taking their turn, the already finished players would wait for them to finish, before the next round can begin. This would allow the game to have significantly less waiting time and allow everyone to feel like they're constantly involved.

31 May, '22
eldar

multiplayer is to boring withou this

01 Jun, '22
Gogi

Will be better if all players will have simultaneous turns. I've played with friends 4 players map for 5 hours and we didn't finish all of us agreed that we will return back to play when the feature will be available cause if you have 3+ magisters and each of them has 3 fights with NPC you will have to wait for 20+ minutes. It's easier to add the button to each player and change the game day to the next day when all players pressed the button. Otherwise, it's taking way too much time. P.s: All the HOMM fans are already grown so they have kids and families and other business to do other than sitting for 20-30 minutes waiting for another player to finish the turn. So, I believe that feature of simultaneous turns should be set as a priority for the next update.

01 Jun, '22
daeruvan

I'm concerned with how simultaneous turns would actually play out... Would this really be a better user experience? Would it be fun to have a wielder run up on you when you're browsing your build menu or purchasing units or in between any of the management tasks?

Gameplay wise, I'm concerned that this mechanic would create new dynamics outside of core gameplay that would take high effort to implement, balance and manage.

However, what I do highly agree with in this thread is the sentiment that players should be able to do SOMETHING when it isn't their turn. I would love to be able to view my wielders' and settlements' UX for example. It would also be great if we could set Tasks to do for our next turn as a way to expedite turns and overall reduce the time each turn would take. I will follow up with a different feature request for this.

I would just ask supporters for simultaneous turns to reconsider. This could consume a lot of dev effort and have unintended consequences.

02 Jun, '22
NeuroN

@daeruvan
No it wouldn't have any unintentional consequences.

There are already many turn based strategy games that have that, and balance and management isn't ever the issue. The only issue is that when players finally meet all but one player will have to redo their turns, but it's small price for hours saved.

Most people ask for it cause most other games in this genre already have this feature.

05 Jun, '22
Valera

simultaneous turn-play is mandatory for online Multiplayer!

08 Jun, '22
Snikta

Simultaneous turns would be awesome, but I'm not sure if it's doable without fundamental changes to the gameplay. Are there really simultaneous turns for HOMM3?

I great turn-based strategy game with a living multiplayer scene AND simultaneous turns is Dominions 5. I don't know about any other games though.

Dominions 5 also has scripted battles, which is great if you don't want a game to take 10 years to complete but still want to keep interesting battle tactics (i.e. not auto battles).

09 Jun, '22
Daniel

Its just my own notice: after 25 hrs playing (all campaign and 1 multiplayer game with friend) I doesn't want to play anymore without simultaneous turns because multiplayer 1v1 takes 5-6 hours without it and all single-player content had been completed, skirmish with bots doesn't fun because its too easy.

Please, add simultaneous turns, its core feature for turn-based games, I guess.

14 Jun, '22
DMITRY

I bought this game for me and my friends, we joined lobby, played like half an hour and all realised that waiting for you turn when there is a 6 players is so damn long and you cant even manage something or just inspect your hero. I think ability to Simultaneous turns is so essential feature for this game.

16 Jun, '22
Moderator Admin

Just wanted to mention that we are currently looking into this. If we can make it work in a satisfactory way, we will release it.

28 Jun, '22
sesleri

This would make the game a must-buy for my family to player together. Asynchronous play and simultaneous turns would be amazing.

03 Jul, '22
Nick

Please if a human player is nearby stop simultaneous turns. Otherwise it's just first come first serve...Thanks!

05 Jul, '22
Chester

I think it would be an excellent idea to add simultaneous turns, it would definitely ensure a couple of extra copies of the game going out to my mates thus generation more revenue.

17 Dec, '22
Daniel Merged

It's so long to wait partner who fight every round & you can't do something by your hero, im so tired just sit & wait ending of my opponent's fight

31 Dec, '22
Mikhail Merged

Please add simultaneous battles in multiplayer like in heroes 3(HOTA addon). For example in heroes 3 every opponent fighting and making their moves simultaneous untill you meet opponent. After you meet someone, if enemy hero in your line of sight the game will load on the previous turn and game mode is changing to turn base.

01 Jan, '23
Tower Merged

isnt that already in game?

23 Apr, '23
Borys Merged

This is not in the game already. The game has "player controls neutrals" option.

So if "player controls neutrals" is disabled or if you are playing 3+ players, everyone has to wait while someone is fighting.

Upvoted

01 Jul, '23
Bob

When playing an online game against AI, simultaneous turns should always be active and should not be blocked when any team member enters a battle.

01 Jul, '23
Edu

At least add simultanous turns while fighting AI , that would make the game faster. Once you find another faction could turn back to normal turns, but meanwhile could be great to not stop the game

18 Jul, '23
Sebastian B. Merged

its good that simultaneous turns are activated for the game, unfortunatly in a multiplayer game with friends the simultaneous turn ends when someone starts a fight. the other players cant do anything in this time.....

25 Jul, '23
Sebastian Merged

Simultaneous fights with NPC's would be better than Control the NPC's Fight, because you dont See the Army of your opponent and your making faster and more Progress in the Game and dont need that much time for one Game.

11 Sep, '23
cédric

simultaneous battle in multiplayer should be good also

23 Sep, '23
Nemo Merged

I tried this game a few times now with friends in multiplayer and we found it to be really annoying to wait all the time while one of us is in battle. Not being able to fight yourself or move your wielders, while an ally is in a fight makes single turns take ages if you don't resolve every fight in auto battle, which i think, if you are forced to do so ,kills the hole fun of the game.
That's why i'd suggest to be able to play simultaneously all the time, if that's not possible at all, at leat beeing able to watch the allies fight would be nice.
Thank you very much
A fellow Wielder

25 Sep, '23
FreezeZ Admin

"Beeing able to keep playing while your ally is in battle" (suggested by Nemo on 2023-09-23), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.

25 Sep, '23
FreezeZ Admin

"Simultaneous battles and mouvments" (suggested by Koladik on 2023-09-12), including upvotes (1) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.

25 Sep, '23
FreezeZ Admin

"simultaneous battles multiplayer" (suggested by Mikhail on 2022-12-31), including upvotes (6) and comments (0), was merged into this suggestion.

25 Sep, '23
FreezeZ Admin

"create simultaneous fights" (suggested by Sebastian B. on 2023-07-18), including upvotes (3) and comments (1), was merged into this suggestion.

25 Sep, '23
FreezeZ Admin

"Simultaneous turns in multiplayer during battle" (suggested by Daniel on 2022-12-17), including upvotes (8) and comments (2), was merged into this suggestion.

06 Oct, '23
gman

...even during combat...

20 Nov, '23
Djordje Markovic

Simultaneous fights are a MUST, imo, at least as an option. We played in four players the last night, and it was tedious waiting for someone to do a battle before someone else could go. One friend left earlier because he was bored, and everyone really liked the game. It was like living with 10 roommates, with only one bathroom. Is it some architecture problem or do you think this breaks some kind of balance? Everything else in Sim Turns works great! Pls, add this feature!

25 Nov, '23
Kuk!

Does this feature request include the simultaneos battles or do we need to make a new one?

Simultaneous turns in multiplayer

Comments: 85